From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11619 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2005 09:43:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11588 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Aug 2005 09:43:21 -0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:43:21 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-208-42.inter.net.il [83.130.208.42]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BDC56845 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:43:16 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20050812012810.GA10011@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:28:10 -0400) Subject: Re: RFC: MI output during program execution Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1123605445.30442.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <20050809181311.GB3012@white> <20050809223421.GB3557@white> <20050810004128.GA4264@nevyn.them.org> <20050810004826.GD3557@white> <2040BEEA-4200-4118-91EB-D093ED4D37A1@apple.com> <20050812012810.GA10011@white> X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:28:10 -0400 > From: Bob Rossi > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > Thanks for all the guidence so far. Even though you have not attempted > the observer approach, how do you feel about it? Is this something that > you think could be accomplished with the current FSF GDB? Nick, Daniel > and Eli, do you like this approach? The record will show that I dislike using observers in core GDB sources (i.e. in the sources released with official GDB distributions). But my opinions on this are usually voted down.