From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3281 invoked by alias); 5 May 2006 10:06:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 3268 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2006 10:06:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 May 2006 10:06:51 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-67-63.inter.net.il [80.230.67.63]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DGX37366 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 5 May 2006 13:06:46 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 10:06:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Jim Blandy" CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <8f2776cb0605041024u7c420707ie2fbff8a32ce32f0@mail.gmail.com> (jimb@red-bean.com) Subject: Re: RFA: Document conventions for terminating query/set packet names Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060503195650.GA13156@nevyn.them.org> <20060504015712.GA19810@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0605032313s69362babjcda4e60fe33f9d6e@mail.gmail.com> <20060504123755.GA29302@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0605041024u7c420707ie2fbff8a32ce32f0@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:24:22 -0700 > From: "Jim Blandy" > > Here's a revised patch: > > 2006-05-04 Jim Blandy > > * gdb.texinfo (General Query Packets): Document conventions for > terminating packet names, and their violations. Fine with me, but... > ! The name of a query or set packet should be separated from any > ! parameters by a @samp{:}; the parameters themselves should be > ! separated by @samp{,} or @samp{;}. Stubs must be careful to match the > ! full packet name, in case packet names have common prefixes. The > ! @code{qP} and @code{qL} packets predate these conventions; since we > ! suspect they are in widespread use in places that are difficult to > ! upgrade, new packets should not begin with @code{qP} or @code{qL}. ...perhaps the last sentence will be better placed in a footnote. WDYT?