From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-56494-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10227 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2008 10:21:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 10219 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2008 10:21:42 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:21:22 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([83.130.2.23]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K21004E1D8S59C0@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:03:42 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:21:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: --with-pkgversion and --with-bugurl support for GDB
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806052127230.9469@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <ufxrqc1cb.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805191702570.19513@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <ufxsei0tu.fsf@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805191942380.1489@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <ubq31irlm.fsf@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805201608130.12876@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20080605202431.GK25085@caradoc.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806052127230.9469@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:28:15 +0000 (UTC)
> From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
> cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> +static void
> +gdbreplay_version (void)
> +{
> +  printf ("GNU gdbreplay %s%s\n"
> +	  "Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n"
> +	  "gdbserver is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License.\n"
> +	  "This gdbserver was configured as \"%s\"\n",
> +	  PKGVERSION, version, host_name);

We start by announcing a "GNU gdbreplay", but thereafter talk about
"gdbserver".  Is that right?  Shouldn't we either (1) use gdbreplay
throughout, or (2) say something like "GNU gdbreplay (gdbserver %s%s)"?