From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-59972-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4131 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2008 18:33:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 4064 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2008 18:33:46 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (HELO mtaout4.012.net.il) (84.95.2.10)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:33:07 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout4.012.net.il by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KAC00F006259000@i_mtaout4.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:34:56 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.205.49]) by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KAC005M26A0S0O0@i_mtaout4.012.net.il>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:34:56 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:09:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Process record and replay, 3/10
In-reply-to: <daef60380811140740k63bde85fw1e4e2e03485c22e@mail.gmail.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
To: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <ufxlunoo7.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <daef60380811052346k5ce7b477w7ba987c581c18c4c@mail.gmail.com> <uk5bfsezf.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380811101859qbe97d51q779249de3e171f52@mail.gmail.com> <umyg2o6ye.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380811140740k63bde85fw1e4e2e03485c22e@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00363.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:40:22 +0800
> From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> >> >> +               error (_("Process record: record stop the program."));
> >> >
> >> > Do you mean
> >> >
> >> >    Process record: program recording stopped.
> >> >
> >> > ?
> >>
> >> What about "Process record stop inferior."
> >
> > I'm not sure.  Can you explain what exactly does this message try to
> > say?  I will then suggest a better wording.
> 
> OK. When P record want make inferior stop. It will use this code.

Then I think

  error (_("Process record: inferior program stopped."));

> >> >> +  if (ret < 0)
> >> >> +    error (_("Process record record message error."));
> >> >
> >> > Do you mean something like "Process record error."?  That is, does
> >> > this happen when some error is encountered inside
> >> > gdbarch_process_record?
> >> >
> >>
> >> What about "Process record execute log error"?
> >
> > "Error executing process log record"?
> 
> What about "Process record target record execute log failed"?

I think "Process record: failed to record execution log" is better.