From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27296 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2009 19:14:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 27285 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2009 19:14:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:14:33 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KFW0050084GPC00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:15:09 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.248.57]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KFW00GM2857GAQ0@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:15:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:14:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: make attaching to stopped processes work under windows In-reply-to: <20090302172305.GK26056@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: oswald.buddenhagen@trolltech.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <20090226192552.GB15958@troll08.nokia.trolltech.de> <20090228004414.GA21767@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090302100651.GA8157@troll08.nokia.trolltech.de> <20090302172305.GK26056@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:23:05 -0800 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > Suspending random threads like this is usually a bad idea. Do you > > > actually have a use cause that requires attaching to suspended threads? > > > > > i should point out that the patch contains a comment answering that > > question and that i pointed that out in the only sentence the mail > > contained. so please be a little bit more attentive, or make it somewhat > > clearer that you already are (by relating to previous content when you > > ask something). thanks. > > Please, let's remain courteous. Chris is not your employee, he is > a volunteer who maintains, among other things, the Windows ports of GDB. 100% agreement. Even if the said comment did answer the question (which it doesn't, even after I re-read it several times), there's no justification for such rudeness in response to a simple query.