From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62013-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3377 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2009 19:41:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 3369 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Mar 2009 19:41:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:41:15 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KG9005007XPIM00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:41:54 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.192.247]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KG9009B281S6QH0@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:41:53 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:41:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] disassemble-next-line
In-reply-to: <m3vdqi67lg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: teawater@gmail.com, dje@google.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <ufxhmlc18.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <daef60380903072134n381d57a8ob82ac9c777d97bff@mail.gmail.com> <m3vdqi67lg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2

> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
>         Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>,
>         Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
>         "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:26:03 -0600
> 
> teawater> +Show debugger's willingness to use disassemble-next-line."), _("\
> teawater> +If on, gdb will output the assembly codes of next line.\n\
> 
> This also reads strangely, but I don't have a suggestion for what it
> ought to say.  I think it should at least say when the assembly will
> be displayed.  "assembly codes" in particular sounds odd to me.

How about

  If ON, GDB will disassemble next source line.

> teawater> +If auto (which is the default), gdb will output a assembly code\n\
> teawater> +at current address if there is not line message."),
> 
> "at the current address"
> 
> The line message bit could use rewording as well; at least s/not/no/.

Right.  FWIW, I don't even understand what a "line message" is.