Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [commit] Mention VAX floating-point support in NEWS
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <uek5y99lq.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051102051802.GC974@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:18:02 -0800)

> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:18:02 -0800
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> I don't want to let the example of one person (AFAIK) affect the
> productivity of the rest.

I fail to see how asking for approval of a 2-liner, and a day or two
of delay waiting for responses, could possibly affect productivity.
For that matter, I don't see how changes in NEWS can affect
development in the first place.

> If you guys prefer to enforce RFAs, I won't in the least bit object.

I don't want to enforce RFAs, I'd like to see people do that out of
their free will.  Cooperation and comradeship cannot be enforced.

> Just as an aside, we at AdaCore use the review-after-commit approach.

There are many different modes of doing this.  Emacs, for example,
uses commit-at-will-without-any-review, and it works fairly well
(changes are almost never reverted).  But as long as we are following
the current GDB procedures and don't want to change them, we should
adhere to them, letter and spirit, because that's the only way of
restoring trust and good cooperative atmosphere.


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-02 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-01  7:31 Mark Kettenis
2005-11-01 19:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-01 20:56   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-02  4:32     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-01 21:22   ` Mark Kettenis
2005-11-02  4:40     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-01 23:00   ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-02  5:18     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-02  5:55       ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-02 20:34         ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-11-02 23:00           ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-02 23:04             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-03  1:34               ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-03  6:58               ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=uek5y99lq.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox