From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32167 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2005 04:33:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 32160 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2005 04:33:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 04:33:09 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-71-23.inter.net.il [80.230.71.23]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id DAR71240 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:32:59 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:31:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew STUBBS CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20051123210732.GA22982@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:07:32 -0500) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 'Undefined command' error message Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20051116201300.GA23472@nevyn.them.org> <4382072A.1010402@st.com> <43849117.5030805@st.com> <4384BD74.1060600@st.com> <20051123191940.GA20765@nevyn.them.org> <20051123210732.GA22982@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00443.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:07:32 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Andrew STUBBS , schwab@suse.de, > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > So if "u+1" returned 'unknown command "u+1"' instead, I think that > would be an acceptable change, especially if it reduces some > special-cases in the handling of commands. Thanks. Yes, I agree with that. Andrew, does this resolve your doubt about how to go about this issue?