From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6834 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2005 04:41:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 6819 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2005 04:41:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:41:13 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-13-159.inter.net.il [80.230.13.159]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.2-GA) with ESMTP id DBQ79521 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:40:59 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:20:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Michael Snyder CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <438B8B6F.6010706@redhat.com> (message from Michael Snyder on Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:57:51 -0800) Subject: Re: [RFC] multi-process gdb (forks, checkpoints) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <438B8B6F.6010706@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:57:51 -0800 > From: Michael Snyder > > This is, no kidding, gdb debugging multiple processes. Wow! Thanks! > Eli, I'll be working on documentation. For the mean time, > the user interface looks like this: > > set/show detach-on-fork (on/off) [default on] > info forks > fork [analogous to thread ] > detach-fork > delete-fork [and kill] I'd prefer that we use ``process'' instead of ``fork'' here. That is, info processes process [assuming n is a PID] detach-process delete-process