From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14809 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2006 18:18:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 14617 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2006 18:18:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:18:18 +0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id HVJ11085; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:18:12 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-87-210.inter.net.il [80.230.87.210]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CRF62599 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:18:10 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:18:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060210161800.GC2235@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (message from Christopher Faylor on Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:18:00 -0500) Subject: Re: RFA: Support Windows extended error numbers in safe_strerror Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060203215455.GA3501@nevyn.them.org> <20060206173550.GB22947@nevyn.them.org> <200602062254.k16MsagK009925@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060206225829.GA31895@nevyn.them.org> <20060208000855.GA5040@nevyn.them.org> <200602082107.k18L7xRh013417@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060209223719.GA3865@nevyn.them.org> <20060210161800.GC2235@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:18:00 -0500 > From: Christopher Faylor > > I'm wondering if a top-level "mingw" directory might simplify things here? I think that's too complex for the simple problems we have.