From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4892 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2006 21:28:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 4884 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2006 21:28:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:28:16 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-242-30.inter.net.il [84.228.242.30]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id FZA78487 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:28:12 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20061010145213.GA20993@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:52:13 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfc] Clarify shared library warning Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20061010145213.GA20993@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:52:13 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > But this warning isn't very self-explanatory. I was thinking something > like the below, in addition. How does this sound? > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected > address > warning: the wrong version of the shared library may have been found Such a change is a good idea, I think. We could make it shorter, though: warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected address (wrong version of the shared library?)