From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-46402-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19092 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2006 19:11:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 19077 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2006 19:11:15 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:11:09 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-11-159.inter.net.il [80.230.11.159]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) 	with ESMTP id FIJ67033 (AUTH halo1); 	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:10:56 +0200 (IST)
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:11:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uejrmax17.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <200611292157.37913.ghost@cs.msu.su> (message from Vladimir Prus 	on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:57:37 +0300)
Subject: Re: MI docs: remove historic note
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <200611151735.25903.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <ekkac0$51a$1@sea.gmane.org> <uodqqay9y.fsf@gnu.org> <200611292157.37913.ghost@cs.msu.su>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00406.txt.bz2

> From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:57:37 +0300
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> I certainly don't object -- I was just wondering about the best technical 
> solution. I'll add @ignore later today

Thanks.

> I assume posting a separate patch is not required?

No.  It's a trivial change relative to what you already posted.