From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16005 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2008 21:02:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 15989 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2008 21:02:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:02:23 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-116-121.inter.net.il [84.229.116.121]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id IUE57758 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:59:47 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vladimir Prus CC: cgd@google.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200801071833.51795.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (message from Vladimir Prus on Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:33:51 +0300) Subject: Re: [RFA] Try2: Inform about new thread in a single place. Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200712212104.37823.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712212215.43869.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200801071833.51795.vladimir@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:33:51 +0300 > Cc: cgd@google.com, > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > On Saturday 22 December 2007 12:59:29 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Vladimir Prus > > > Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:15:43 +0300 > > > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > > > > > * [eliz] thread-attach -> thread-events in the gdb.texinfo change. * > > > > (I forgot to change one copy of my old command name) > > > > > > > > * [eliz] GDB -> @value(GDBN} in the gdb.texinfo change as well. > > > > > > I've missed those, sorry. Here's the revised patch. > > > > Thanks, but one instance of a literal "GDB" was still left uncaught: > > > > > +Show whether messages will be printed when GDB detects that threads > > Is the patch OK to commit, as soon as this bit is fixed? Yes, as far as I'm concerned.