From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28376 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2008 04:13:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 28361 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jan 2008 04:13:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:13:16 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-7-153.inter.net.il [80.230.7.153]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id JXX96835 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:12:49 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:13:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, uweigand@de.ibm.com, brobecker@adacore.com, msnyder@specifix.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:36:11 -0800) Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue? Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200801152140.m0FLeMha003566@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <200801161034.m0GAYfpk000326@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00426.txt.bz2 > Cc: Mark Kettenis , uweigand@de.ibm.com, > brobecker@adacore.com, msnyder@specifix.com, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Jim Blandy > Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:36:11 -0800 > > GDB allows 'FILENAME'::FUNCTION in C expressions: Thanks. But if "break *'FILENAME'::FUNCTION" works, why is it wrong to expect that "break *FILENAME:FUNCTION" should also work. None of them is a valid C expression, it's just something GDB does to help the user, right?