From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26337 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2008 21:29:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 26328 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2008 21:29:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:28:50 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-14-171.inter.net.il [80.230.14.171]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FCT47847 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:28:46 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:58:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20080227205144.GB14556@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:51:44 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa/rfc] Debug output timestamps Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20070413133209.GA11212@caradoc.them.org> <20070415080556.GA29271@adacore.com> <20080227205144.GB14556@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00457.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:51:44 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > * NEWS: Mention "set debug timestamp". Add GDB 6.8 section. > > 2008-02-27 Daniel Jacobowitz > > * gdb.texinfo (Debugging Output): Document "set debug timestamp". This is okay, but wouldn't it be better to also show hours and minutes? That's what I'd expect when I read the word ``timestamp'' in the docs.