From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-56504-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3804 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2008 19:46:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 3796 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2008 19:46:31 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:46:12 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([80.230.28.131]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K22005P73EQXV20@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:28:02 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:46:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to limit field name completion candidates
In-reply-to: <m3iqwma1wt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uej7anyae.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m38wyf6py1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20080605170952.GJ29085@caradoc.them.org> <m3k5h3d6xt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20080605194553.GG25085@caradoc.them.org> <m3bq2fd4zl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20080605200807.GJ25085@caradoc.them.org> <m3mylzbd6o.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20080606023129.GB23233@caradoc.them.org> <m3ej7bb7zi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <uej7ac0z7.fsf@gnu.org> <m3iqwma1wt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2

> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:50:10 -0600
> 
> Eli> These limitations should be mentioned in the manual, at least as a
> Eli> @footnote, I think.
> 
> Good idea.
> 
> Here is an updated patch.  I've updated the NEWS and manual bits -- I
> used "struct or union" and made the index entries refer to both struct
> and union.
> 
> Also, this changes the patch to search base classes for field names.

Thanks, I'm happy now.