From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11222 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2008 19:45:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 11211 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Oct 2008 19:45:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:45:12 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.24.3]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K8S00FRTPJ01010@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:45:01 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:45:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [reverse RFC] Add documentation for process record and replay In-reply-to: <48F63B15.3070705@vmware.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Michael Snyder Cc: teawater@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <48F63B15.3070705@vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:48:53 -0700 > From: Michael Snyder > CC: teawater , > "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > > Eli, I think the relation is that we will save one log entry > for each instruction executed. Not necessarily that we save > the instruction itself, but since we do save the PC (it being > part of the state that is changed by executing the instruction), > we always have access to the instruction itself if we want it > (either in memory or in object file). I understand that (now). But the original text, viz. When this target is in use, if the next instruction to be executed is in the execution log, ... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ made it sound like the instructions themselves are in the log. This will need to be rephrased.