From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3125 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2008 20:39:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 3114 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2008 20:39:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (HELO mtaout1.012.net.il) (84.95.2.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:38:49 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KB700900SYU2Q00@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:39:49 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.215.205]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KB7001WWTECHJH0@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:39:49 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:39:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] -list-target-groups --available In-reply-to: <200812011111.21264.vladimir@codesourcery.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Vladimir Prus Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <200811142003.33600.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200812011111.21264.vladimir@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:11:20 +0300 > Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > . @appendix is an equivalent of @section, so its immediate sub-nodes > > cannot be @section's. They should be @appendixsubsec instead. > > That lead to texinfo/tex errors. @appendixsection, however, appears to > work fine both to info and pdf output. Sorry, my bad. Yes, @appendixsection is the right command. > > > +Each item is required to include a column with name of @samp{pid}, > > > +that identifies the process. > > > > "name of `pid'" does not sound right. Do you mean " the name of the > > process identified by @var{pid}"? > > I mean that: > > - the name of the column should be 'pid' > - the value of the column should identify the process > > I've clarified this and also addressed Dan's comments. Revised patch > attached, OK? Yes, but I have a better suggestion: > +Each item should include a column with name of @samp{pid}. Each item should include a column whose name is @samp{pid}.