From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28705 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2009 19:18:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 28691 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2009 19:18:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:17:56 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KFW00100856F900@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:18:06 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.248.57]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KFW0011Z8A4P2Y4@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:18:05 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:18:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: make attaching to stopped processes work under windows In-reply-to: <20090302182826.GA11548@troll08.nokia.trolltech.de> To: Oswald Buddenhagen Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <20090226192552.GB15958@troll08.nokia.trolltech.de> <20090228004414.GA21767@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090302100651.GA8157@troll08.nokia.trolltech.de> <20090302172305.GK26056@adacore.com> <20090302182826.GA11548@troll08.nokia.trolltech.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 19:28:26 +0100 > From: Oswald Buddenhagen > > i really have problems taking this situation seriously, even when i > am a completely overloaded maintainer of several projects myself. Well, take our word for it: your response appeared extremely rude for no good reason. > but the original response didn't even appear to do that, it rather > seemed like cfg didn't read the mail past the subject line. As someone who have certainly read the patch, I can assure you that Chris's question didn't sound like it was answered in the comment. Please consider the possibility that you didn't express yourself clearly enough in that comment, rather than that people don't read your mail before asking questions.