From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23828 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2003 06:07:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23813 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 06:07:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 06:07:35 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A7TwL-00076r-Ii; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 02:06:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 06:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: David Carlton CC: jimb@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com,gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from David Carlton on Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:38:51 -0700) Subject: Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8] Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20031008165534.GA8718@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2 > From: David Carlton > Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:38:51 -0700 > > [...] situations where two different user breakpoints both contain > command lists and both map to the same machine breakpoint. (Is that > possible? Yes, it's possible, and even useful: imagine several breakpoints on the same spot, but with different conditions.