From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29177 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2004 13:40:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29170 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2004 13:40:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2004 13:40:29 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B7aTl-0000jB-5W; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:37:33 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:40:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stephane Carrez CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4066C5D4.5010109@nerim.fr> (message from Stephane Carrez on Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:32:20 +0200) Subject: Re: [RFA]: Document tui reg commands Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <405318FE.8000904@nerim.fr> <6480-Sat13Mar2004182210+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <4066C5D4.5010109@nerim.fr> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00702.txt.bz2 > > I agree. The semantics of 'system' is unclear to me. For 'save/restore' > may be the TUI should skip them silently as they are related to gdb internals > (registers that are saved/restored by gdb when it calls inferior functions). > > From my point of view, if these groups should ever be documented, they should > be documented outside of the TUI chapter (but today this is the only place > 'register group' is mentionned...; apart from mainainters commands...) Agreed. Can someone please donate a description of these register groups?