From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Baurjan Ismagulov Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: handling of absolute source file paths Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 14:33:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <20040420154855.GD9020@ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr> <20040501171420.GB21679@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <9743-Sat01May2004211140+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040508212208.GA1019@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00270.html > Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 23:22:08 +0200 > From: Baurjan Ismagulov > > > Also, this specific sentence is not very clear; perhaps an example > > using the file names and the source path from your example would help > > understand it better. > > Tried to do; please review the new variant. It's fine, thanks. There are still a few uses of ``pathname'', though, where ``file name'' is appropriate: > +Plain filenames, relative pathnames, pathnames with dots, etc.@: are > +all treated as described above; for instance, if the source path is > Are you waiting for this one to commit > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-04/msg00463.html ? Sorry, I can't say right now: can't access that page for some reason. Will try later.