From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10351 invoked by alias); 2 May 2006 18:55:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 10338 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2006 18:55:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 May 2006 18:55:44 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-31-178.inter.net.il [80.230.31.178]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id ECG66517 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 2 May 2006 21:55:39 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 18:55:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060502172920.GA5593@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 2 May 2006 13:29:20 -0400) Subject: Re: RFA: Undocument set remotedebug Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060502172920.GA5593@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:29:20 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Eli, I preserved the index entries, since they all seemed reasonable. Yes, they are. > But now "set debug remote" has five, which seems like a bit much. Are you talking about these 5 @cindex entries: > @cindex packets, reporting on stdout > @cindex serial connections, debugging > +@cindex debug remote protocol > +@cindex remote protocol debugging > +@cindex display remote packets > @item set debug remote If so, there's nothing wrong with extra index entries, as long as we believe that these are reasonable subjects to look up when one is looking for the information described in this section. This patch is approved. Thanks.