From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30115 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2006 03:19:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 30058 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2006 03:19:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 03:19:22 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-205-139.inter.net.il [84.229.205.139]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id FLW96103 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:19:14 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:50:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20060808224119.GE19846@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:41:19 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFA/NEWS] document addition of set/show/unset substitute-path Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060808224119.GE19846@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:41:19 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > > What do you guys think of the following patch. I tried to keep > things relatively short and succint. Does it need to be expanded > a bit or is it clear enough? I think it's clear enough. Please commit this. Thanks.