From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25765 invoked by alias); 9 May 2007 19:47:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 25752 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2007 19:47:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2007 19:47:07 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-159-227.inter.net.il [80.230.159.227]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id CNX52329 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 9 May 2007 22:47:01 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 19:47:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20070509191215.GA14410@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 9 May 2007 15:12:15 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfc / remote protocol] ELF segment based qOffsets Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20070509191215.GA14410@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:12:15 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > > Here is the documentation of the new support, and the patch is at the > end of the message. What do you all think? Eli, is the > documentation OK? Yes, thanks.