From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25832 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2007 20:38:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 25824 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2007 20:38:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:38:33 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-205-94.inter.net.il [84.229.205.94]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id CSI82470 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:38:28 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Ulrich Weigand" CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <200706021934.l52JY1ZD005660@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (uweigand@de.ibm.com) Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa] [4/4] SPU enhancements: GDB/MI extensions Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200706021934.l52JY1ZD005660@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:34:01 +0200 (CEST) > From: "Ulrich Weigand" > Cc: eliz@gnu.org > > Eli, doc changes OK? Yes, thanks. I have a comment: > +Display SPU signal notification facility status. This command is available > +only when @value{GDBN} is debugging the Cell Broadband Engine SPU architecture. A cross-reference to the section you added about SPU would be useful here. Similarly for other MI commands that are SPU-specific. Btw, I think the addition of SPU support and the change in the qXfer packet are worth entries in NEWS.