From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11436 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2007 20:35:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 11418 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2007 20:35:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:34:55 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-198-53.inter.net.il [80.230.198.53]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id JQL47636 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:34:35 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:43:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:46:09 -0800) Subject: Re: RFA: Fix per-thread watchpoint documentation Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2 > From: Jim Blandy > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:46:09 -0800 > > > The GDB documentation doesn't build at the moment, because the > per-thread watchpoint documentation introduces an @item outside any > @table. > > One could fix this by simply wrapping a @table around the new @item, > but it doesn't seem to me that that description is in the right place > within its node. > > So, does this look okay? Yes, but you also changed other places which you didn't announce. Not that I object to them, though... Thanks.