From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20659 invoked by alias); 2 May 2008 09:58:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 20650 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2008 09:58:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (HELO mtaout4.012.net.il) (84.95.2.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2008 09:58:29 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.228.217]) by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K0800DPJKCH97C2@i_mtaout4.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 02 May 2008 13:12:18 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 09:58:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] Allow to enable run/stop notifications for function calls. In-reply-to: <200805011751.48573.vladimir@codesourcery.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <200805011751.48573.vladimir@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 17:51:48 +0400 > > > This patch allows a frontend to request the notification for function > calls to be still emitted, by using > > -enable-feature infcall-run-stop-notifications > > OK? Should we document it?