From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31298 invoked by alias); 17 May 2008 14:06:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 31244 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2008 14:05:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 May 2008 14:05:20 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([83.130.255.47]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K1000125NT30YZ1@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Sat, 17 May 2008 17:19:52 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 17:44:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] New annotation for threads In-reply-to: <20080517135757.GK6437@brasko.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Bob Rossi Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <18440.29531.916381.569346@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080429023735.GD841@adacore.com> <18454.43094.168458.742737@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080501181758.GD3801@adacore.com> <18458.21177.959458.278174@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080501233703.GF3801@adacore.com> <18458.23326.25887.70597@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18478.48682.13900.951343@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080517135757.GK6437@brasko.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00535.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 09:57:57 -0400 > From: Bob Rossi > Cc: Nick Roberts , brobecker@adacore.com, > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:53:02PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Nick Roberts > > > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 23:14:50 +1200 > > > Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > > > > Documenting a feature helps and encourages it's use. > > > > Then you should submit a patch to remove all docs of annotations from > > the manual, and try to convince us to accept it. Not documenting just > > one piece is inconsistent and doesn't make sense. > > I would object to a patch like this. Me too, but if Nick could convince most of the other maintainers, I'd have hard time refusing to do it.