From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5445 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2008 19:18:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 5437 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2008 19:18:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.7) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:17:48 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.7.152]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K5300M07C9YURC0@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:17:58 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:18:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA][patch 1/9] Yet another respin of the patch with initial Python support In-reply-to: <1217824913.9336.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <20080615181833.uxmo25mg0kko40kw@imap.linux.ibm.com> <1216107418.14956.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1216245620.12209.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080718195010.GA14356@caradoc.them.org> <1216653969.31797.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080726134252.GA6077@caradoc.them.org> <20080726144138.GA9711@caradoc.them.org> <1217429936.4804.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1217824913.9336.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann > Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:41:53 -0300 > > > Sorry, I'm unconvinced. Both features belong to a broader category of > > means of extending GDB. > > In that case, my opinion is that the current "Canned Sequences of > Commands" chapter should be demoted to a section (and its sections would > then be demoted to subsubsections), and both this section and Python's > section should be under a chapter called "Extending GDB". Agreed. > Rereading this thread, I think this is what Daniel suggested in the > first place. And I agreed: >> Ok, in that case I have an alternative suggestion: how about renaming >> the combined scripting chapter, and putting both Python scripting and >> the existing information in the new chapter? > > I have no objections to renaming that chapter. > >> I don't think Python makes sense as a section of "Canned Sequences of >> Commands", because Python scripts don't contain GDB commands. > > The chapter name doesn't say "GDB Commands", it says just "Commands". > But let's not argue about that on which we agree ;-)