From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-40047-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22061 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2005 08:56:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22046 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2005 08:55:57 -0000
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:55:57 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-159-161.inter.net.il [80.230.159.161])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id BOL79721 (AUTH halo1);
	Sat, 18 Jun 2005 11:55:53 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:56:00 -0000
Message-Id: <ubr640z17.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20050617133311.GB23901@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:33:11 -0400)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] -stack-select-frame
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <17072.62436.183299.55978@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050616044209.GA5907@nevyn.them.org> <17073.5179.249482.402135@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050616132120.GA5277@nevyn.them.org> <17074.566.194312.713028@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050616234728.GA14260@nevyn.them.org> <17074.16093.924351.774111@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050617032149.GF17013@nevyn.them.org> <17074.32276.804157.95131@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <umzpp1bgv.fsf@gnu.org> <20050617133311.GB23901@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:33:11 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> > I think we should simply @ignore-out such commands.
> 
> I'm OK with that, especially if you prefer it.  I'd like to either do
> that, or expand the N.A. to be explicit ("N.A.@: - not implemented
> yet").

The choice depends on whether we expect someone to work on
implementing at least some of these commands shortly.  If we do, it is
better to leave them visible in the manual, so that potential
volunteers would see them, which means the latter possibility.

If we don't think they will be implemented soon, it doesn't make sense
to me to leave them in the manual.