From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1278 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2006 19:14:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 1270 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2006 19:14:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:14:52 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-90-229.inter.net.il [80.230.90.229]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DXJ75134 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 6 Apr 2006 22:14:42 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20060406163009.GA29559@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 6 Apr 2006 12:30:09 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA] Add "del" as alias to "delete" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060406162400.GK1055@adacore.com> <20060406163009.GA29559@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 12:30:09 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > Does anyone think we should make "dele" and "delet" work again too? I don't know. Back compatibility says YES, but at least the second one is too strange to have, IMO.