From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11186 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2007 19:00:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 11176 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jan 2007 19:00:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:00:29 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-1-217.inter.net.il [83.130.1.217]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FYC12220 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:00:16 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:00:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andreas Schwab CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:12:37 +0100) Subject: Re: Testsuite failures in gdb.gdb/selftest.exp Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00619.txt.bz2 > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:12:37 +0100 > > With heavy optimizations there can be even more code reordering, causing > spurious failures in do_steps_and_nexts. Isn't it better to just disable optimizations? This is a GDB testsuite, not a compiler testsuite. Or am I missing something?