From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31858 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2006 18:52:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 31850 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2006 18:52:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:52:29 +0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id HVJ14502; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:48:31 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-87-210.inter.net.il [80.230.87.210]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CRF70441 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:48:29 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:52:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Denis PILAT CC: drow@false.org, andrew.stubbs@st.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, bash-maintainers@gnu.org In-reply-to: <43ECB429.6070003@st.com> (message from Denis PILAT on Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:41:29 +0100) Subject: Re: [readline-mingw] backspace key and TUI size Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <43E9A5B1.1030001@st.com> <20060208134335.GA22980@nevyn.them.org> <43EA1655.609@st.com> <20060208161452.GA26965@nevyn.them.org> <43EA201B.5080305@st.com> <20060208165114.GA28698@nevyn.them.org> <43EA2A39.4000107@st.com> <20060208173951.GA31572@nevyn.them.org> <43EB0CF9.1080406@st.com> <20060209134942.GA23253@nevyn.them.org> <43ECB429.6070003@st.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:41:29 +0100 > From: Denis PILAT > Cc: Andrew STUBBS , Eli Zaretskii , > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, bash-maintainers@gnu.org > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote > > >>Regarding the TUI size, the approach seems to be fine, can I send you a > >>new patch whith a ChangeLog for that ? > >> > >> > > > >Yes, please. > > > > > > > Attached is the new proposal with only TUI stuffs. This one is fine with me. Thanks!