From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30807 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2006 09:46:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 30799 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Mar 2006 09:46:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:46:37 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-30-202.inter.net.il [80.230.30.202]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DUZ88346 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:46:11 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:21:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy , sje@cup.hp.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060324043008.GA5092@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:30:08 -0500) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove gdb/nlm subdirectory Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200603240102.RAA18110@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <8f2776cb0603232024u163c75edm20eb01ff1d476d18@mail.gmail.com> <20060324043008.GA5092@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00270.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:30:08 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: sje@cup.hp.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > For things that folks still might, conceivably, be using in current > versions of GDB, and things that we still reasonably expect to work, > the obsoletion interval makes sense. Do we have good reasons to believe the nlm stuff is not used, or cannot be built with a reasonable amount of effort? If so, I see no reason to have the staging period. Otherwise, let's leave this for the next release.