From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10179 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2006 08:11:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 10167 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2006 08:11:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:11:25 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-224-166.inter.net.il [84.229.224.166]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id GCJ08802 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:11:02 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:11:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20061026123344.GA29148@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:33:44 -0400) Subject: Re: QPassSignals patch to go with proposed protocol Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20061025212805.GA872@nevyn.them.org> <20061026123344.GA29148@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:33:44 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > +@cindex inform remote target of signals passed to the inferior > > > > This index entry is too long. > > Is this better? > > @cindex inform remote target of unnecessary signals Is the ``inform'' part really necessary? How about this instead? @cindex remote target, signals to ignore Other than that, the new text is okay with me. Thanks.