From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17691 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2007 12:43:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 17571 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Mar 2007 12:43:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:43:35 +0100 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-206-92.inter.net.il [84.229.206.92]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id GKJ59413 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:43:29 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:43:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, kettenis@gnu.org In-reply-to: <20070329203657.GC19477@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:36:57 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa] Followup for obsolete targets Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20070329203657.GC19477@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00355.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:36:57 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Mark Kettenis > > This patch removes some bits and pieces associated with the targets I > just removed - support code and documentation. Is this OK? Okay for the doco, with a single comment, see below. > Eli, I think that some of the other sections on target-specific > commands are for targets that were removed some time ago. Just > for your information - I didn't double-check. I don't know enough about this to know what to remove. At the time, I ran a script on all the .c files that found things like add_cmd and its ilk, and made sure each such command is documented in the manual, but I certainly didn't sweep for documented commands that we no longer have. If someone knows about such commands and can explain what port used them, I will approve such removal (or remove myself, if needed). > --- doc/gdb.texinfo 26 Mar 2007 21:28:20 -0000 1.395 > +++ doc/gdb.texinfo 29 Mar 2007 20:26:00 -0000 > @@ -1241,37 +1241,12 @@ option (@pxref{Mode Options, ,Choosing m > @cindex init file name > @cindex @file{.gdbinit} > The @value{GDBN} init files are normally called @file{.gdbinit}. > -On some configurations of @value{GDBN}, the init file is known by a > -different name (these are typically environments where a specialized > -form of @value{GDBN} may need to coexist with other forms, hence a > -different name for the specialized version's init file). These are the > -environments with special init file names: > - > -@itemize @bullet > -@cindex @file{gdb.ini} > -@item > The DJGPP port of @value{GDBN} uses the name @file{gdb.ini}, due to Why did you remove the index entry for gdb.ini?