From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20813 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2003 06:18:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20758 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2003 06:18:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2003 06:18:32 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AEjb7-0004Af-CG; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 01:14:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 06:18:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on 28 Oct 2003 16:59:57 -0500) Subject: Re: RFA: fix node name (revised patch) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <9003-Sat25Oct2003145827+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00834.txt.bz2 > From: Jim Blandy > Date: 28 Oct 2003 16:59:57 -0500 > > So there is no underlying problem in GDB's documentation build > process; it is an anomaly introduced by our internal processes. Thanks for looking into this.