From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26746 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2006 19:02:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 26736 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2006 19:02:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:02:34 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-161-27.inter.net.il [84.228.161.27]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DQX54181 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 21:02:30 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Wu Zhou , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20060301050501.GA18703@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:05:01 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060228135310.GA25487@nevyn.them.org> <20060301043203.GA17621@nevyn.them.org> <20060301050501.GA18703@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:05:01 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Wu Zhou , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > This is the same name that, e.g., gfortran probably uses in some > error messages. If "int4" is the official gfortran name (is it?), then I agree we should leave it alone. > No, it can't be quite that simple, because current versions of Fortran > do support user-named types - "int4" does not necessarily imply > integer(4). Perhaps I'm confused: isn't "int4" a 32-bit integer? I thought it was, but if I was mistaken, my apologies for the noise. > Paul also corrected me on the naming - this would be integer(4) > apparently, integer*4 is something different. Can you (or someone else) elaborate, or point me to some document that does?