From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20932 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2006 03:28:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 20923 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2006 03:28:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 03:28:10 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-72-151.inter.net.il [80.230.72.151]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EBG44894 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 06:28:04 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 03:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Michael Snyder CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4450068F.4000303@redhat.com> (message from Michael Snyder on Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:47:27 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFC] Rename "delete-fork" to "delete fork" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4450068F.4000303@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00358.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:47:27 -0700 > From: Michael Snyder > > This is to remove the ambiguity between 'delete' and 'delete-fork' > (by using the already-in-place mechanism that I should have used > in the first place). Please modify the manual to reflect the command renaming. TIA