Re: [RFC/RFA/i386] pb reading insns if breakpoints still inserted

Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-29T14:51:34Z

> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:28:12 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> Now, you could make a reasonable argument that the default when reading
> memory ought to be to ignore breakpoints. But that would be a much
> harder change to test; we'd need to catch all the places which do need
> to see breakpoints

We don't need to catch all of them at once, if that's hard. We can
catch them one by one and fix them as we do.

> I can only think of one off the top of my head, but I'm sure there
> are more. So, I would suggest making it separately.

It's fine with me, but I still don't understand why it has to be in an
architecture-specific file, not in some more general place. Am I
missing something?