From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3658 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2008 21:28:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 3650 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2008 21:28:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:27:48 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-116-121.inter.net.il [84.229.116.121]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id IUE73288 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:23:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ARistovski@qnx.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, RMansfield@qnx.com In-reply-to: <20080107131649.GA31612@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:16:49 -0500) Subject: Re: [patch] IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH to handle both DOS and POSIX path st yles Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <2F6320727174C448A52CEB63D85D11F40A58@nova.ott.qnx.com> <20080106054030.GA10410@caradoc.them.org> <20080107034031.GA28431@caradoc.them.org> <20080107131649.GA31612@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:16:49 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ARistovski@qnx.com, > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, RMansfield@qnx.com > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:20:29AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > We must have a way for a user on a Posix system to have file names > > with `\' or `:'. It is IMO unacceptable to say that these cases, > > however corner, are simply not supported. Other packages, such as > > Bash, do give you a way of having them, albeit an inconvenient way. > > Can you suggest one that does not break these more common cases? > > Perhaps a tri-state option... Yes, I still think a user option is the best solution. Failing that, perhaps some kind of quoting would do. But I'm afraid that would require lots of changes to GDB code.