From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-60145-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5686 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2008 04:21:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 5646 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2008 04:21:13 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (HELO mtaout4.012.net.il) (84.95.2.10)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:20:33 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout4.012.net.il by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KAM00B006RJDY00@i_mtaout4.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:21:53 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.113.18]) by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KAM00EZ96SGH7Z0@i_mtaout4.012.net.il>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:21:53 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:46:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] fix thinko in sym info
In-reply-to: <20081119233115.GD3838@adacore.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: dje@google.com, ppluzhnikov@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <u8wrfkozw.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20081119225237.1D8751C799D@localhost> <20081119233115.GD3838@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00536.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:31:15 -0500
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: ppluzhnikov@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > The outstanding question is, of course, whether
> > 
> >   "%s + %u", msym_name, offset
> > 
> > needs i18n.  This patch assumes it doesn't.
> 
> I would tend to agree, although perhaps someone who has knowledge with
> languages that write right-to-left might come up with a case where
> they'd translate "SYMBOL + OFFSET" differently from the original.

No problem here, as long as SYMBOL uses only ASCII characters: the
Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm mandates that a text that includes
ASCII characters, digits, and a plus sign be rendered left to right.