From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2088 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2002 19:32:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2041 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2002 19:32:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2002 19:32:03 -0000 Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [213.95.15.136]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713E61E2DF for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:32:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from aj by arthur.inka.de with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 16r26P-00038Y-00 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:31:57 +0100 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: FYI: gdbserver branch merges References: <20020329141059.B12204@nevyn.them.org> From: Andreas Jaeger Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20020329141059.B12204@nevyn.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:10:59 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence, i386-suse-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00604.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > I've moved these patches to the branch. This is all the gdbserver > changes except for x86-64 (which was too invasive, and I don't consider > urgent since x86-64 is not yet a production architecture) since we > branched. For the signals code I created new files without removing > the old definitions. For when is 5.2 planned and when is the next release? Since x86-64 is currently not production ready, we can make big changes. The first hammer systems are going to ship by the end of the year so that I expect that we'll use GDB 5.2 on them. Could you rethink this, please? Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj