Re: [rfa/doco] Update to fdl 1.2

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>]

> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:31:04 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> 
> 
> Subject says it all.  Ok?

Certainly.

As a btw, this version should use @dfn in more places, IMHO.  Here
are those I spotted:

>  This License is a kind of ``copyleft'', which means that derivative
>  works of the document must themselves be free in the same sense.

@dfn{copyleft}

>  A ``Modified Version'' of the Document means any work containing the
>  Document or a portion of it, either copied verbatim, or with
>  modifications and/or translated into another language.

@dfn{Modified Version}

>  A ``Transparent'' copy of the Document means a machine-readable copy,
>  represented in a format whose specification is available to the

@dfn{Transparent}

>  The ``Title Page'' means, for a printed book, the title page itself,
>  plus such following pages as are needed to hold, legibly, the material

@dfn{Title Page}

I don't know where to send these comments; if you do, please forward.