From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 300 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2005 19:41:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32749 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Oct 2005 19:41:30 -0000 Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:41:30 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-205-185.inter.net.il [83.130.205.185]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CTJ31523 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:40:55 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:41:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew STUBBS CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4357C346.8070400@st.com> (message from Andrew STUBBS on Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:18:14 +0100) Subject: Re: PATCH: Problem union comparision in TUI Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4353BA69.1030401@st.com> <43561685.3010300@st.com> <20051019200751.GA19037@nevyn.them.org> <43576E68.8080804@st.com> <4357C346.8070400@st.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:18:14 +0100 > From: Andrew STUBBS > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > Therefore, an alternative fix for this problem would be to figure out > which window we are in for the problem comparison. I an not sure whether > that would be a better solution or not. I still think that adding a tag to the union is the cleanest solution.