From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-41417-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17376 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2005 04:10:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 17364 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2005 04:10:27 -0000
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 04:10:27 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-56-202.inter.net.il [80.230.56.202])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id CZF25204 (AUTH halo1);
	Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:10:23 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:35:00 -0000
Message-Id: <u7jbaim9z.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
CC: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <4378BB1A.9070606@st.com> (message from Andrew STUBBS on Mon, 14
	Nov 2005 16:28:10 +0000)
Subject: Re: $argc variable
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <436A0BD2.5080505@st.com> <20051107001800.GF19200@nevyn.them.org> <436F35E9.4070808@st.com> <20051107133538.GA2331@nevyn.them.org> <43709E94.4070004@st.com> <u7jbisp6n.fsf@gnu.org> <4371D9A6.40109@st.com> <u3bm5sk6i.fsf@gnu.org> <43731C16.2040203@st.com> <20051113173524.GC1945@nevyn.them.org> <4378BB1A.9070606@st.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:28:10 +0000
> From: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > It looks OK to me.  Could you post the revised documentation (to
> > gdb-patches, please) so that we can make sure that Eli and you did
> > converge?  I couldn't quite follow your earlier conversation.
> 
> Here is the full patch including both code and docs.
> 
> In the end I have dropped the index altogether. Eli didn't like the 
> kindex and the cindex would be so close to the cindex for the section, 
> and so similar in content, that it would be pointless.
> 
> I still think there is an argument for a kindex entry for both $argc and 
> $arg0...$arg1 in case people don't know they are looking for 
> 'user-defined', but I'm not really that bothered.
> 
> OK?

OK for the documentation patch.