From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24564 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2006 16:23:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 24452 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2006 16:23:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:23:37 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-153-247.inter.net.il [80.230.153.247]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CLP28511 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:23:32 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:23:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060114154909.GB12028@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:49:09 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFA] Allow use of breakpoint commands inside `if' or `while' Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060113153213.GA10138@nevyn.them.org> <20060114154909.GB12028@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:49:09 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:02:35PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > You mean in gdb.base/commands.exp? I suppose I could do that, but I > > don't have a test suite set up anywhere on the machines to which I > > have access, so it might not be easy for me to test the tests I add. > > That's very unfortunate - it's standard practice to insist that code > patches be tested by the testsuite. Yes, I know. Any pointers to howto set up a test suite from scratch with minimal pain (on a Debian box)? I might give it a try on some rainy day. > But if you can't do this, would you mind drafting some tests, and > then I'll make sure they work and commit them? Will do. Thanks for the offer.