From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21157 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2006 10:03:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 21146 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2006 10:03:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:03:02 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-232-140.inter.net.il [84.229.232.140]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id AQL94214 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:02:52 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:03:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20061005224238.GE14087@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:42:38 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa] Allow a target to adjust target_has_execution while remaining active Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20061005224238.GE14087@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:42:38 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > How about the docs? The docs are okay, except that > +A target which supports both partial and complete activation should > +still call @code{push_target} in @code{to_open}, but not call > +@code{unpush_target} in @code{to_mourn_inferior}. Instead, it should > +call one of @code{target_mark_running} and @code{target_mark_exited} ^^^ in the last line above, ``and'' should be ``or''. (Actually, for a list of 2 alternatives, ``either ... or ...'' is better.)