From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31405 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2007 09:29:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 31384 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2007 09:29:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:29:20 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-248-242.inter.net.il [80.230.248.242]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FQQ72855 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:29:13 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:29:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vladimir Prus CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Vladimir Prus on Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:00:36 +0300) Subject: Re: [mi] [ada] varobjs for registers 2 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200612202137.29038.vladimir@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:00:36 +0300 > > > > Please add a cross-reference to the description of -var-create here. > > Is > > Using the @code{-var-create} (@pxref{-var-list-children}) command > > the right texinfo way to do a reference? Yes, one of them. > Revised patch attached. In addition to the changes you've suggested, I've > reworded the first paragraph to more explicitly document that -var-list > tries to return previously-created varobjs, as Nick and I discussed. > > OK? It's okay, but please fix this: > +if necessary. This command is intended to efficiently obtain a number ^^ Two spaces after the period, please. > +object. In addition, subsequent @code{-var-list} invocations generally ^^ Ditto.